I bought the card as well. I asked someone else what settings to program the ESC. I’ll attach them below. You have to watch a YouTube video to learn how to use it but it’s pretty simple once you see it. I had to solder the 3 female motor connectors and extend the battery lead. I bought the extension off amazon.
Official Freewing 90mm F-16 Falcon Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
I only fly with HRB batteries. The 5000mah 50c have been great. The probably have 75-100 EDF flights on them. I decided to try the 6000mah HRB today and I have buyers remorse. The F-16 will get 4 minuets of pretty hard flying on the 5000s. I assumed I’d get a little longer of a flight from the added size. That was not the case. It obviously flew heavier and I decided to land at 3:30. The plane landed great, but wouldn’t provide thrust after it came to a full stop. I had just done the YEP 150amp ESC and FMS upgrade so I thought I fried something. I checked the battery when I got home and it had 3% left. I’m guessing the workload of carrying the extra weight used the battery up quicker? Or do you think it was just a new battery that hadn’t been broken in? I wish I stuck with the 5000... there was a noticeable difference in performance. Oh, that ESC and fan upgrade is a must... both are cheaper together that the freewing inrunner2 PhotosComment
-
Ouch! Yes it did. There is a point when battery weight overloads the performance parameters of a given size of the plane. I would actually venture to guess if you had gone the other way, to 4500 or even 4000 you could have gotten the extra flight time due to not needing as much on the go stick.I only fly with HRB batteries. The 5000mah 50c have been great. The probably have 75-100 EDF flights on them. I decided to try the 6000mah HRB today and I have buyers remorse. The F-16 will get 4 minuets of pretty hard flying on the 5000s. I assumed I’d get a little longer of a flight from the added size. That was not the case. It obviously flew heavier and I decided to land at 3:30. The plane landed great, but wouldn’t provide thrust after it came to a full stop. I had just done the YEP 150amp ESC and FMS upgrade so I thought I fried something. I checked the battery when I got home and it had 3% left. I’m guessing the workload of carrying the extra weight used the battery up quicker? Or do you think it was just a new battery that hadn’t been broken in? I wish I stuck with the 5000... there was a noticeable difference in performance. Oh, that ESC and fan upgrade is a must... both are cheaper together that the freewing inrunnerComment
-
Yeah I kinda figured I’ll try it in other planes with less of a wing load.
Ouch! Yes it did. There is a point when battery weight overloads the performance parameters of a given size of the plane. I would actually venture to guess if you had gone the other way, to 4500 or even 4000 you could have gotten the extra flight time due to not needing as much on the go stick.
Comment
-
The stock ESC will eventually stop working. Everyone that said theirs worked fine came back and retracted their statements with the eventual ruined 130a ESC. The YEP 150a and the FMS fan combined is actually the cheaper option and weighs less.Comment
-
Comment
-
I put a gps unit in my F-16 with the YEP 150 and FMS fan. It clocked 111mph in level flight using a 4000mah batteryComment
-
-
Comment
-
I upgraded my F-16 to the inrunner FW 4068-1680kv and it is just perfect, not to fast that you need expo but better than stock and even though vertical isn't unlimited, it went up as far as I could hardly tell which way it was going, love it, it was worth the investment. It was good stock but the upgrade gave it a little more speed and vertical and a great sound. I tried the FMS 12 blade 1900kv in my F-15, it wasn't any faster than the FW upgrade, so I didn't try it in the F-16, in the F-15 it's a drop in fit but the F-16 requires a little surgery, so that is the other reason I went with the FW, it's a drop in fit and I don't have to buy another ESC, these stock ESC's seem to be fine, lots of flights with no issues using the FW 4068-1680. So now my F-15, F-16 and the F-4 have the 4068-1680, sweet sound.Comment
-
At first I was going to do the same and even purchased the Inrunner. I wanted the weight savings so I went with the FMS and YEP 150 because it was so much lighter and actually cost less for both components than just for the heavier Inrunner. I sold it on eBay. Do you have telemetry or a gps unit in yours? Just curious to see what is faster. My F-16 was 111mph in level flight
I upgraded my F-16 to the inrunner FW 4068-1680kv and it is just perfect, not to fast that you need expo but better than stock and even though vertical isn't unlimited, it went up as far as I could hardly tell which way it was going, love it, it was worth the investment. It was good stock but the upgrade gave it a little more speed and vertical and a great sound. I tried the FMS 12 blade 1900kv in my F-15, it wasn't any faster than the FW upgrade, so I didn't try it in the F-16, in the F-15 it's a drop in fit but the F-16 requires a little surgery, so that is the other reason I went with the FW, it's a drop in fit and I don't have to buy another ESC, these stock ESC's seem to be fine, lots of flights with no issues using the FW 4068-1680. So now my F-15, F-16 and the F-4 have the 4068-1680, sweet sound.
Comment
-
No, I don't have any idea on my speed, don't run telemetry or anything like that, I flew it stock and made the switch in 10 minutes and flew back to back and yes, way better than stock. I didn't go with the FMS because I didn't want to cut on my fuselage, the FW unit is a drop in fit and you can use the stock ESC. I wasn't impressed with the FMS unit in the F-15 so I didn't want to bother with it in the F-16. The FMS is lighter, but the FW sounds better, that inrunner is quiet so you can really hear the wooosh, which is what I like more than performance.
At first I was going to do the same and even purchased the Inrunner. I wanted the weight savings so I went with the FMS and YEP 150 because it was so much lighter and actually cost less for both components than just for the heavier Inrunner. I sold it on eBay. Do you have telemetry or a gps unit in yours? Just curious to see what is faster. My F-16 was 111mph in level flightComment
-
Comment
-
I have the FW "High-Speed" in-runner on a 6S in my F-15 as was thinking about trying the FMS fan in it. Can I assume you would recommend keeping what I have in it instead?
I bought the 8S F-4 with the intent of pulling the power system and putting it in the F-16. I've only flown it once so far as an 8S but it was such a difference that two other guys at my field are now getting the 8S setup as well.
No, I don't have any idea on my speed, don't run telemetry or anything like that, I flew it stock and made the switch in 10 minutes and flew back to back and yes, way better than stock. I didn't go with the FMS because I didn't want to cut on my fuselage, the FW unit is a drop in fit and you can use the stock ESC. I wasn't impressed with the FMS unit in the F-15 so I didn't want to bother with it in the F-16. The FMS is lighter, but the FW sounds better, that inrunner is quiet so you can really hear the wooosh, which is what I like more than performance.Comment
-
Wow, I knew it was fast but not that fast, impressive I would say....:Cool:Comment
-
Sounds like you had your share of problems with the gear, I've had four of these 90mm F-16 and only once did I have a problem with one nose gear, it was acting up so I bought a new one and it didn't want to work right either so I mixed some parts from the old unit with the new and it worked great with a whole bunch of flights after that and then I sold it but it was still working great, my other three didn't have any issues at all and I fly off asphalt and had hard landings. So you could have a problem somewhere in the board maybe. Can you post a video of them working so we can see how they work?Comment






Comment